Agenda for June 2017 meeting

Agenda for June 2017 board meeting

Meeting to be held at 8pm BST on Saturday 24 June 2017
at irc.starlink-irc.org #autscape

Apologies:


1. Approvals

1.1 Minutes of the May 2017 meeting posted to the list on 19th June 2017.

1.2 Minutes of the special June 2017 Autscape main programme meeting posted
    to the list on 19th June 2017.


2. Ratifications

No ratifications.


3. Proposals

3.1 Hug and touch symbols
 
3.1.1) The Chair proposes that the hugging/touching symbol (whether opt in
       or opt out) in future be regarded as just for hugs and not for any
       other type of touch with this being clearly defined in the
       orientation.
 
The following will need rewording if 3.1.1 does not carry.
 
3.1.2) The chair proposes that the orange stars opt in will in future be:
       a) Orange star as before - opt in to be open to asking about hug
       b) Changed to Black star - opt out so that anyone not wearing one is
          open to being asked about hug
       c) Reverted to original situation ie no symbol indicating hug
          preference.
 
3.1.3) The Chair proposes that the board resolves to actively discourage the
       use of unofficial badges (i.e. asking members not to wear them if
       seen, and include such guidance in the orientation and any relevant
       written material.)

3.2 Report and proposal to do with pay by instalments (Debbie)

    REPORT: Payment by instalments

    Payment by instalments was welcomed by a number of people, and I would
    like Autscape to continue offering this service.

    The full report is in Appendix 1.

    Proposal

    I would like to board to agree in principle to using a third-party
    direct debit handler. If the board agrees, then I shall research what
    providers exist, and then make recommendations based on the research.

3.3 The Company Secretary proposes the following amendment to the
    Confidentiality paragraph in the Lists Policy:

    Confidentiality

    Subscription to the list must be with a personal email address. Family
    email addresses are allowed eg JohnandSueSmith@gmail.com but not group
    email addresses where others may access the list eg.
    Johnselectrical@gmail.com or autismcollective@gmail.com

    Autscape cannot guarantee that messages sent to the mailing lists will
    not be redistributed. However, we expect list subscribers to be
    respectful of other list users and treat all posts as confidential and
    not repeat or reproduce either part or the whole of a message in another
    place unless the sender explicitly states they can.

    To avoid misunderstandings and to minimise offence we also do not allow
    people to ask if they can quote somebody.

    If it is brought to the board's attention that people are being asked by
    private email or a post has been reproduced elsewhere without the
    originators permission, then the board will take action and may sanction
    a subscriber which could result in them being removed from the list.

    However, we may allow general requests for quotes eg. To further
    research or contribute to somebody's work in another area and surveys or
    questionnaires. In these instances permission must first be sought from
    the moderators who may set boundaries at their discretion.
 
3.4 The Company Secretary proposes we the board accept the Annual report as
    sent to list.
 
3.5 The Event Manager proposed that they be given authority to….. (Kalen
    what exactly do you want?)
 
3.6 The chair proposes that the board spend some of the surplus on a
    training day and onsite meeting for the board. To include a venue, food
    and travel as appropriate. Amount to be confirmed later.
 
    We should also delegate someone to make the booking and give them the
    authority to pay for it (or commit to paying for it).


4. Role Updates

4.1 Company Treasurer
4.2.1 Event Manager
4.2.2 Programme Co-ordinator
4.2.3 Registrar
4.3 Chair
4.4 Company Secretary
4.5 Fundraising Co-ordinator
4.6 Honorary Secretary
4.7 List Co-ordinator
4.8 Membership Secretary
4.9 Tech Co-ordinator
4.10 Venue Search Co-ordinator


5. Any Other Business


Closed portion of meeting

6 Roles
 
6.1 Venue Search Coordinator (volunteers?)


Appendix 1

REPORT: Payment by instalments

Payment by instalments was welcomed by a number of people, and I would
like Autscape to continue offering this service.

Summary

Instalments proved to be a lot of work in a number cases. I need to
reduce the effort it takes for this service to be viable.

It worked well, when payment was committed in advance, even if the level
of commitment is just setting some dates in on-line banking. It didn't
work when the payee was required them to have organisational effort
several times.

The details - what happened in practice

When it worked well:

- They sent us a set of post-dated cheques

- They set up a payment schedule (like a standing order) with their bank
  (Very few people worked out how to do this.)

When it worked badly:

- Many people did a series of one-off payments with their bank;
  inevitably, some of them forgot one or more payments

- Some people intentionally missed payments so they could spend the
  money on something else. The first we knew of this is when we spotted
  the instalment was not received.

- Some people didn't agree in advance with us to pay by instalments, but
  did so anyway. We couldn't know if they were late because there was
  no agreed schedule. We also couldn't know if they would actually
  finish paying the full amount on time, again because of the lack of
  agreed schedule.

- In many cases, when a payment was late, they didn't reply to emails.
  This is not a new problem, but now it is multiplied by the number of
  instalments.

- For some it prolonged the decision of whether or not they could afford
  Autscape.

The future

Post-dated cheques worked well, so we should continue to offer that way
of paying. If we do it again, we'll choose payment dates to allow
batching of cheques to be paid in once a month or once a fortnight,
rather than once a week.

I am looking into a direct debit solution. There are third-party
providers who can deal with the banks for a small commission, comparable
to PayPal charges.

Proposal

I would like to board to agree in principle to using a third-party
direct debit handler. If the board agrees, then I shall research what
providers exist, and then make recommendations based on the research.